Teff is a warm-season annual grass originally developed and grown in Ethiopia as a grain. Although it’s been suggested to have lower palatability than some other more common grasses, in recent years it has become popular among horse owners in the U.S. looking to reduce the amount of sugar in their horses’ diets.
There is a bit of research looking at the use of teff hay in diets where low sugar, low starch forages are warranted or required and forage intake restrictions are recommended.
Staniar et al 2010: These authors report non-structural carbohydrate (NSC) contents for teff of 5.4% in the ‘boot’ stage and 8.4% in the ‘late heading stage’ of plant maturity. Both really low NSC levels and well below the 10 – 12% threshold considered safe for laminitic/ID/EMS/PPID horses. Variation in NSC levels between samples was also minimal.
Horses in this study ate 1.5% to 1.8% of their bodyweight in teff hay, with the lower intakes being on the more mature hay. Again, this is a good thing as horses on restricted diets are unlikely to eat this hay as fast as more palatable hays like alfalfa, so they should eat for longer periods of time for lower calorie intake.
McCown et al 2012: Reported that when fed to horses unaccustomed to teff and given a choice of either teff and alfalfa or teff and timothy, their intake of teff is lower than their intake of alfalfa (no surprise there) and timothy. BUT, when given access to only teff, intake was about the same as timothy hay. So they don’t relish teff hay, but they are also less likely to overeat it if they are overweight to begin with.
Askins et al 2017: These authors report that horses given free access to teff hay consumed 1.5% of their bodyweight per day which equated to 86% of maintenance calorie requirements. So the finding of lower intake on teff continues.
This study also reports that resting glucose and insulin levels did not change over 10 days while the horses were fed teff. To keep this in context however, ryegrass hay (which can be higher in NSCs) was fed as the control hay in this study and glucose and insulin levels also remained the same on this hay. Unfortunately the NSC content of the hays was not reported.
DeBoer et al 2017: In another recent study, these authors report that cool season perennial grasses had a significantly higher NSC content than teff pasture in summer and fall/autumn, however actual NSC content was not reported.
This research also looked at differences in plasma glucose levels in horses grazing either alfalfa, cool season grasses or teff and found that differences were minimal. However, we know that insulin resistant horses can maintain normal glucose levels, they just need a lot more insulin to achieve this.
DeBoer et al 2018: Authors report that horses grazing teff had significantly lower peak insulin levels when compared to horses grazing cool season grasses in fall/autumn… despite NSC levels not being significantly different between the grasses (the cool season grasses had numerically higher NSC values but when variation was taken into account they were not significantly different). It is worth noting here however that teff was not recorded with an NSC above 10% at any time point where the cool season grasses did reach 12.6% NSC in summer.
Overall, from the research available, teff appears to be suitable for horses who need either a calorie restricted and/or NSC restricted diet. However, if you are going to use teff hay for a metabolically challenged horse, it is still wise to test it to confirm NSC levels.
Adapted from an article by Nerida McGilchrist.
No comments:
Post a Comment